NN Annotator

[AdminX]

Is it possible that a Neural Network could be used to annotate chess games better than what we have now on the market? One that would give a better human readable format. One that could use GPU technology.

[amanjpro]

Is it possible that a Neural Network could be used to annotate chess games better than what we have now on the market? One that would give a better human readable format. One that could use GPU technology.

Have you seen ChessCoach? I believe this is the best thing right now: https://chrisbutner.github.io/ChessCoach/

[op12no2]

Have you seen ChessCoach? I believe this is the best thing right now: https://chrisbutner.github.io/ChessCoach/

Wow, what an interesting project.

[AdminX]

Is it possible that a Neural Network could be used to annotate chess games better than what we have now on the market? One that would give a better human readable format. One that could use GPU technology.

Have you seen ChessCoach? I believe this is the best thing right now: https://chrisbutner.github.io/ChessCoach/

I did not know about this, I will try to download and compile it. I look forward to taking it out for a test drive, so I can see how it compares.

Thanks.

https://github.com/chrisbutner/ChessCoach#contents

[dkappe]

Have you seen ChessCoach? I believe this is the best thing right now: https://chrisbutner.github.io/ChessCoach/

Wow, what an interesting project.

Interesting but not very good at the moment.

[Cornfed]

I find most all such things to be of the 'read and nod' variety - an approach that really doesn't 'teach' you much unless you are a beginner. Just 'descriptive' stuff. Kind of like watching an announcer describe the play during a ball game...it tells (teaches?) you about what 'has happened', but it doesn't do much to teach you about HOW to actually play the game.

A gold mine for one really wanting to improve would be an approach which teaches or trains you on what you should be looking for and doing in positions while playing a game or even after in analysis. But then, that is upper level programming and would be hard to do and translate into a language for the user to understand.

[dkappe]

I find most all such things to be of the 'read and nod' variety - an approach that really doesn't 'teach' you much unless you are a beginner. Just 'descriptive' stuff. Kind of like watching an announcer describe the play during a ball game...it tells (teaches?) you about what 'has happened', but it doesn't do much to teach you about HOW to actually play the game.

A gold mine for one really wanting to improve would be an approach which teaches or trains you on what you should be looking for and doing in positions while playing a game or even after in analysis. But then, that is upper level programming and would be hard to do and translate into a language for the user to understand.

Actually, this approach is very promising. It is encoding a feature plane of a chess playing net into text. It just doesn’t have a very good training set for text encoding.