Rodent NN

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Dann Corbit, Harvey Williamson

User avatar
Rebel
Posts: 6946
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:04 pm

Rodent NN

Post by Rebel »

Rodent from Pawel Koziol is one of those engines with an excellent HCE evaluation.

Rodent IV 0.22 is rated 2988 on CCRL and 2998 on GRL.

We decided to move Rodent to NNUE evaluation, created a dataset of 800 million analyzed positions with Rodent 4.022 and moved the 800 million positions into the learner, tested the new created net with Rebel and Rodent NN gained about 200 elo over Rodent 4.022

In reality the Rodent net is actually 300 elo stronger when Pawel will implement the net into his own (Rodent) source code.

http://rebel13.nl/windows/rodent-nn.html
90% of coding is debugging, the other 10% is writing bugs.
Frank Quisinsky
Posts: 6808
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
Location: Gutweiler, Germany
Full name: Frank Quisinsky

Re: Rodent NN

Post by Frank Quisinsky »

https://www.amateurschach.de/t-ki/common/ki-ratings.jpg

Inside!
I wish Pawel good luck ... the playing style of the version I tested is fantastic!
User avatar
pohl4711
Posts: 2388
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:25 am
Location: Berlin, Germany
Full name: Stefan Pohl

Re: Rodent NN

Post by pohl4711 »

Rebel wrote: Fri Apr 01, 2022 9:34 am
In reality the Rodent net is actually 300 elo stronger when Pawel will implement the net into his own (Rodent) source code.
The question is: Will that happen or not? Means: Should we test this Toga 4/Rodent nnue Engine/Net-hybrid or should we wait for a "complete" Rodent nnue engine-release of Pawel?
User avatar
Rebel
Posts: 6946
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:04 pm

Re: Rodent NN

Post by Rebel »

pohl4711 wrote: Fri Apr 01, 2022 12:59 pm
Rebel wrote: Fri Apr 01, 2022 9:34 am
In reality the Rodent net is actually 300 elo stronger when Pawel will implement the net into his own (Rodent) source code.
The question is: Will that happen or not? Means: Should we test this Toga 4/Rodent nnue Engine/Net-hybrid or should we wait for a "complete" Rodent nnue engine-release of Pawel?
The idea from the start was that Pawel will implement the net in his own source code, thus a complete Rodent nnue as you have called it.
90% of coding is debugging, the other 10% is writing bugs.
User avatar
Rebel
Posts: 6946
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:04 pm

Re: Rodent NN

Post by Rebel »

Frank Quisinsky wrote: Fri Apr 01, 2022 12:19 pm https://www.amateurschach.de/t-ki/common/ki-ratings.jpg

Inside!
I wish Pawel good luck ... the playing style of the version I tested is fantastic!
It is indeed.
90% of coding is debugging, the other 10% is writing bugs.
Frank Quisinsky
Posts: 6808
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
Location: Gutweiler, Germany
Full name: Frank Quisinsky

Re: Rodent NN

Post by Frank Quisinsky »

Hi Ed,

BTW:
I am looking in short-game stats from Rebel 14.2 (still running run-3 after 20 of 30 rounds or after 800 from 1.200 games).

Rebel 14.2 NN ... 16x won, 14x lost.

Wasp isn't on place 1 I am await before ...
I forgot Andscacs 0.1 NNSf ...

1. Andscacs 0.1 NNSf ... 76x won, 0x lost
2. Booot 7.0 NN dev ... 46x won, 0x lost
3. Fire 8.2 ... 44x won, 3x lost
4. Igel 3.010 NN ... 43x won, 0x lost
5. Tucano 10.00 NN ... 40x won, 3x lost
6. Wasp 5.30 NN dev ... 40x won, 4x lost
7. Arasan 23.2 NN ... 39x won, 0x lost

Maybe place 2 is possible (for the moment place 6) ... to many others are very strong in "run-3".
4x lost is a lot for Wasp ... the start of tourney with "short-games-statistic" was bad.
Very sure it will go higher.

Do you changed anything what can important here?
My feeling is that Rebel 14.1 NN was stronger in attacking chess!?

Elo gain is great ... for the moment +35
TogaIV 1.1 NNRe will be start soon (run-4).
Wilhelm created a logo for TogaIV.

Best
Frank