SPCC: Testruns of Stockfish 221123 finished

[pohl4711]

Ratinglist- and regression-testruns of Stockfish 221123 finished.


https://www.sp-cc.de

Also take a look at the EAS-Ratinglist, the world's first engine-ratinglist not measuring strength of engines but engines's style of play:
https://www.sp-cc.de/eas-ratinglist.htm

(Perhaps you have to clear your browsercache (press <STRG>+<SHIFT>+<DEL>) or reload the website))

[Angle]

Hi, Stefan!
Why Booot is not in your list?

[ernest]

Ratinglist- and regression-testruns of Stockfish 221123 finished.

https://www.sp-cc.de

Hi Stefan,

What do you mean by : (best Stockfish Elo so far: Stockfish 220817 3814 SPCC-Elo)

Did I miss something ?

[pohl4711]

Ratinglist- and regression-testruns of Stockfish 221123 finished.

https://www.sp-cc.de

Hi Stefan,

What do you mean by : (best Stockfish Elo so far: Stockfish 220817 3814 SPCC-Elo)

Did I miss something ?

Only the latest 2 tested SF devs are in my ratinglist, all older SF devs are deleted. Otherwise the ratinglist would be unreadable and distorted...
So, I wrote the highest rating, a SF dev has reached, separately. And this was Stockfish 220817. Since that version, Stockfish has regressed a little. Look at the diagram/chart below the ratinglist...

[pohl4711]

Hi, Stefan!
Why Booot is not in your list?

Booot 7 is buggy and does not run properly in cutechess-cli, when a lot of instances of Booot are running simultaneously. I reported that problem here, but sadly, the author did not fix the bug until now. As far as I know.

[ernest]

Only the latest 2 tested SF devs are in my ratinglist, all older SF devs are deleted. Otherwise the ratinglist would be unreadable and distorted...
So, I wrote the highest rating, a SF dev has reached, separately. And this was Stockfish 220817. Since that version, Stockfish has regressed a little. Look at the diagram/chart below the ratinglist...

Ok thanks, the diagram below makes it clear...

But maybe you could still leave the highest rated SF in the ratinglist