SPCC: Testrun of Booot 7.1 finished

[pohl4711]

Ratinglist-testrun of Booot 7.1 finished.

Booot 7.0 (first release with nnue-evaluation) did not run properly in cutechess-cli, so I could not test it. But Booot 7.1 avx2 works fine on my 12core AMD Ryzen CPU, when running in cutechess-cli.

https://www.sp-cc.de

Also take a look at the EAS-Ratinglist, the world's first engine-ratinglist not measuring strength of engines but engines's style of play:
https://www.sp-cc.de/eas-ratinglist.htm

(Perhaps you have to clear your browsercache (press STRG+SHIFT+DEL) or reload the website))

[Frank Quisinsky]

Code: Select all

 
   1    251020  36.95%  34.98%  09.56%   69   Dragon 3 aggressive  
   2    239040  35.02%  37.47%  14.14%   65   Velvet 5.1.0 avx2  
   3    212677  28.43%  31.83%  15.63%   69   Danasah 9.0 avx2  
   4    168598  31.47%  23.28%  16.74%   75   Arasan 23.4 avx2  
   5    153809  23.10%  25.97%  18.35%   70   Lc0 0.29 dnll 791921  
   6    150843  22.60%  28.35%  18.74%   71   Viridithas 7.0.0 avx2  
   7    142222  30.49%  18.89%  15.09%   78   Fire 8.NN MCTS avx2  
   8    141103  25.55%  27.35%  21.23%   73   Wasp 6.50 avx  
   9    139374  23.97%  22.48%  16.80%   74   Slow Chess 2.9 avx2  
  10    134064  21.48%  26.36%  17.96%   75   Tucano 10.00 avx2   
  43     65927  09.98%  19.27%  28.08%   75   Booot 7.1 avx2

Hi Stefan,

Arasan is a positive suprise for me. My congratulation to Jon Dart.
Viridithas is for the moment unknown for me ...
Velvet, Danasah, Fire, Slow are quit clear.

But Booot?
So many years Booot is one of the most aggressive engines. The endgame was the problem. Maybe the programmer is working with full power on endgames? The reason why Booot has lost aggressiveness? More likely to switch to neural network?

Best
Frank

PS: From what I know, Wasp is also AVX2.
Thanks for your work for us.