acase wrote: ↑Thu Apr 06, 2023 3:14 am
The goal here is to show a winning score from the root position, and for extra credit to figure out what study and who the author is that I borrowed from.
I suspect that there will be an engine that will achieve the goal and that someone will figure out the study, as usual I'll post a full PGN later with all the details.
[pgn][Event "Modified Study by whom?"]
[Site "Columbus, Ohio"]
[Date "2023.04.05"]
[Round "?"]
[White "?"]
[Black "?"]
[Result "1-0"]
[BlackElo "2000"]
[Time "20:51:23"]
[WhiteElo "2000"]
[TimeControl "0"]
[SetUp "1"]
[FEN "8/p6p/1p2P1Qp/r2RKBpP/pPk1N3/p2b2p1/P2n2R1/1q1r4 w - - 0 1"]
[Termination "normal"]
[PlyCount "0"]
[WhiteType "program"]
[BlackType "human"]
1-0[/pgn]
Took a Cfish because of it's fine persistent TT- feature, Sopel brought up way back for his FT2. Found the compile here
https://www.open-chess.org/viewtopic.php?p=26581#p26581
Classical evaluation, Syzygy ProbeLimit=0, after some Forward- Backward:
8/p6p/1p2P1Qp/r2RKBpP/pPk1N3/p2b2p1/P2n2R1/1q1r4 w - - 0 1
Analysis by Cfish 160223 64 POPCNT:
1.Nxd2+ Rxd2 2.Bxd3+ Qxd3 3.Qxd3+ Rxd3 4.Rxa5 bxa5 5.b5 Re3+ 6.Kd6 Rd3+ 7.Kc6 Rc3 8.e7 Kb4+ 9.Kd5 Re3 10.Kd6 Rd3+ 11.Ke6 Re3+ 12.Kd7 Rd3+ 13.Ke8 Re3 14.Rc2 g4 15.Rg2 Kc4 16.Rg1 Kd3 17.Kd7 Ke2 18.Rxg3 Rxg3 19.e8Q+ Re3 20.Qa8 Kf2 21.Qxa7 g3 22.b6 g2 23.b7 g1Q 24.b8Q Qg4+ 25.Kc6 Qxh5 26.Qf4+ Qf3+ 27.Qxf3+ Kxf3 28.Qxh7 Re6+ 29.Kd7 Rf6 30.Qg7 Rf4 31.Qxh6 Rc4 32.Qe6 Rb4 33.Qg6 Kf2 34.Kc6 Rb2 35.Qe4 Kg3 36.Qe1+ Kh2 37.Qe5+ Kh3 38.Qxa5 Rf2 39.Qh5+ Kg2 40.Qg5+ Kf3 41.Kb5
+- (5.35 ++) Depth: 41/62 00:02:01 9934MN
Edit: in meantime I saw HekaStockfish (Majkel Novak) get a winning eval with 5.b5 in output- line, which seems to be crucial, started with empty hash soon too, also with classical (non- NNUE) eval and Find Mate option checked, regards
Peter.