I'm forbidden or prohibited or banned ?

[Sylwy]

Looks like the same AI fingerprint...

[Graham Banks]

Seeing as you've made this post successfully, I'd say none of them.

[reflectionofpower]

Yeap, that's what happened. That will teach you to try and post here publicly ever again!

[Sylwy]

Seeing as you've made this post successfully, I'd say none of them.

I'm tired of posting here abnormally (ie via VPN or other techniques). If this forum cannot work normally for everyone then: bye-bye!
The end of the overseas dream for me (after 17+3 years of presence)!

[mclane]

This forum is in the hands of people who never had been meant to „own“ it or „lead“ it.

This computerchess forum was dedicated to the computerchess community.
Not to people who takeover the whole forum and behave as BOSS , forcing us members to install all kind of things to have access.

It was an unfriendly takeover.

And we campaigned and told here about this.
But our claims were not taken for serious.
And the „owners“ did very good in splitting us into several groups, divide us so we could not be a danger.

The shut down of CTF was ONE method to get rid of people who complained about Talkchess beeing taken over by a small group of people.

IMO there is only one solution to move talkchess to a European server instead letting it on this „unfriendly takeover“ System that filters out the world.

IMO typical for the computerchess community.

It happened similar with ICCA/ICGA.

Instead an organisation for the members, participants, it became an organisation for the bosses and exploiters of computerchess interests.

Not the members/participants had the pwer but a board of corrupt people who mainly did business out of the interests of the community.