SPCC: Testruns of Stockfish 230520 finished

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderator: Ras

User avatar
pohl4711
Posts: 2819
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:25 am
Location: Berlin, Germany
Full name: Stefan Pohl

SPCC: Testruns of Stockfish 230520 finished

Post by pohl4711 »

Ratinglist-testruns of Stockfish 230520 finished.


https://www.sp-cc.de

https://www.sp-cc.de/uho_ratinglist.htm

Also take a look at the EAS-Ratinglist, the world's first engine-ratinglist not measuring strength of engines but engines's style of play:
https://www.sp-cc.de/eas-ratinglist.htm

(Perhaps you have to clear your browsercache (press STRG+SHIFT+DEL) or reload the website))
Jouni
Posts: 3709
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:15 pm
Full name: Jouni Uski

Re: SPCC: Testruns of Stockfish 230520 finished

Post by Jouni »

In short: Stockfish has regression and Lc0 all new versions at same strength.
Jouni
User avatar
RubiChess
Posts: 646
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2018 7:20 am
Full name: Andreas Matthies

Re: SPCC: Testruns of Stockfish 230520 finished

Post by RubiChess »

Jouni wrote: Fri May 26, 2023 4:37 pm In short: Stockfish has regression and Lc0 all new versions at same strength.
-1 Elo +/-7Elo is a regression?
Jouni
Posts: 3709
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:15 pm
Full name: Jouni Uski

Re: SPCC: Testruns of Stockfish 230520 finished

Post by Jouni »

Also ncm testing shows regression with +-2 error bars. https://nextchessmove.com/dev-builds/sf14.
Jouni
ernest
Posts: 2053
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:30 pm

Re: SPCC: Testruns of Stockfish 230520 finished

Post by ernest »

Jouni wrote: Fri May 26, 2023 10:53 pm Also ncm testing shows regression with +-2 error bars. https://nextchessmove.com/dev-builds/sf14.
And according to NCM, Stockfish 230531 is an even worse regression !