How many times to we have to see 'revert' in the info in the builds before the Stockfish programmers have to admit they are not sort of just throwing things at the wall to see what sticks at this point?
I mean...it's reasonable enough to get results, so one can't complain... but sometimes we need to call it what it is. Hey, it worked for Jackson Pollock. More power to the Pollock's of chess engine tweakers!
Again...totally rhetorical...just gotta think it outloud sometimes.
(Rhetorical) Revert in Stockfish Developmental Builds
Moderator: Ras
-
CornfedForever
- Posts: 648
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2022 4:08 am
- Full name: Brian D. Smith
-
Rebel
- Posts: 7382
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:04 pm
- Full name: Ed Schröder
Re: (Rhetorical) Revert in Stockfish Developmental Builds
NNUE programming is trial on error.
Try everything.
Try everything.
90% of coding is debugging, the other 10% is writing bugs.