My UHO-Top15 Ratinglist is the world's first engine-ratinglist, using UHO-openings, and the world's first ratinglist offering additionally Gamepair-statistics.
Testrun of Stockfih 250112 finished.
https://www.sp-cc.de
Also take a look at the EAS-Ratinglist, the world's first engine-ratinglist not measuring strength of engines but engines's style of play:
https://www.sp-cc.de/eas-ratinglist.htm
(Perhaps you have to clear your browsercache with <strg>+<shift>+<delete> to reload the graphics/diagrams on my website)
SPCC: Testrun of Stockfish 250112 finished
Moderator: Ras
-
- Posts: 2647
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:25 am
- Location: Berlin, Germany
- Full name: Stefan Pohl
-
- Posts: 3533
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:15 pm
- Full name: Jouni Uski
Re: SPCC: Testrun of Stockfish 250112 finished
This was a third successive regression? What's happening?
Jouni
-
- Posts: 2288
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 1:50 am
Re: SPCC: Testrun of Stockfish 250112 finished
The Stockfish project has collapsed. The developers will be working on Shashchess in the future.
Ideas=science. Simplification=engineering.
Without ideas there is nothing to simplify.
Without ideas there is nothing to simplify.
-
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2022 5:26 pm
- Full name: Conor Anstey
Re: SPCC: Testrun of Stockfish 250112 finished
sanest sf-related talkchess post
-
- Posts: 2647
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:25 am
- Location: Berlin, Germany
- Full name: Stefan Pohl
Re: SPCC: Testrun of Stockfish 250112 finished
Regression is a little bit harsh: -2 Celo in a test-setup with an errorbar of +/-4
And when comparing 2 results, the errorbar is sqrt((error1*error1)+(error2*error2))
= 5.7 (for comparing 2 results in my test-setup)
The best score of Stockfish in my testings was only 4 Celo better than the latest dev, so the regression we see right now, is clearly inside errorbar.