My UHO-Top15 Ratinglist is the world's first engine-ratinglist, using UHO-openings, and the world's first ratinglist offering additionally Gamepair-statistics.
Testrun of Obsidian 250706 finished.
https://www.sp-cc.de
Also take a look at the EAS-Ratinglist, the world's first engine-ratinglist not measuring strength of engines but engines's style of play:
https://www.sp-cc.de/eas-ratinglist.htm
As usual, the most spectacular sac-wins of the latest testrun (won by the tested engine) can be replayed directly on my website. The pgn-viewer (by ChessBase) needs Javascript on and Adblockers off:
https://www.sp-cc.de/view-games-with-sacs.htm
(Perhaps you have to clear your browsercache with <strg>+<shift>+<delete> to reload the graphics/diagrams on my website)
SPCC: Testrun of Obsidian 250706 finished
Moderator: Ras
-
- Posts: 2718
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:25 am
- Location: Berlin, Germany
- Full name: Stefan Pohl
-
- Posts: 10800
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:37 am
- Location: Tel-Aviv Israel
Re: SPCC: Testrun of Obsidian 250706 finished
What is the date of this obsidian? 7.6.2025 or 6.7.2025?
I guess 6.7 because latest obsidian is 2 weeks old.
I read in the obsidian thread that latest obsidian (16.14) performed better than Stockfish and in your test it is still not close to stockfish's strength so I wonder what is the true.
https://www.talkchess.com/viewtopic.php ... &start=200
I guess 6.7 because latest obsidian is 2 weeks old.
I read in the obsidian thread that latest obsidian (16.14) performed better than Stockfish and in your test it is still not close to stockfish's strength so I wonder what is the true.
https://www.talkchess.com/viewtopic.php ... &start=200
-
- Posts: 2718
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:25 am
- Location: Berlin, Germany
- Full name: Stefan Pohl
Re: SPCC: Testrun of Obsidian 250706 finished
The version-numbers of the engines on my site are the date written backwards (year,month,day))(example: 250706 = July, 6, 2025).
The different results come from the fact, that the result, you linked here, is based on only 50 games per engine. So, the result is more statistical noise than a result. My results base on 15000 games per engine.
The different results come from the fact, that the result, you linked here, is based on only 50 games per engine. So, the result is more statistical noise than a result. My results base on 15000 games per engine.