Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.
Moderator: Ras
Jouni
Posts: 3857 Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:15 pm
Full name: Jouni Uski
Post
by Jouni » Wed Mar 18, 2026 10:51 pm
Yes I know depth is useless, you cannot compare different engines depts etc! But I noticed, that Reckless has generally 5 plies less than Plenty and SF. Also in opening with 1 core.
Code: Select all
Analysis by PlentyChess 7.0.37:
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.Qc2 0-0 5.a3 Bxc3+ 6.Qxc3 d5 7.e3 c5 8.dxc5 Ne4 9.Qc2 a5 10.cxd5 exd5 11.Bd3
= (0.07) Depth: 47/65 00:09:01 346mN
Analysis by Stockfish 18:
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.d3 Bc5 5.0-0 0-0 6.c3 d6 7.h3 a5 8.Re1 h6 9.Nbd2 Be6 10.Bb5 Qb8 11.Bxc6 bxc6
= (0.22) Depth: 46/68 00:08:49 324mN
Analysis by Reckless 0.9.0:
1.c4
= (0.21 --) Depth: 41/63 00:09:42 368mN
Maybe this is proof, that Reckless is less selective and for this reason solves test positions better than others?
Jouni
Jouni
Posts: 3857 Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:15 pm
Full name: Jouni Uski
Post
by Jouni » Wed Mar 25, 2026 11:56 am
In TCEC (512 threads) Stockfish depth is average 30 higher. And nodespeed double.
Jouni