Now I begin to understand your fascination with this topic. I’ll second the advice you’ve already received to let it go.M ANSARI wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 5:42 pmI hope they have enemas readyIanKennedy wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 3:35 pm He is playing in the US champs next week against Aronian, Caruana, So and Dominguez.
https://www.uschesschamps.com/2022-us-c ... /the-field![]()
Carlsen withdrawal after loss to Niemann
Moderator: Ras
-
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 7:52 pm
- Full name: Dietrich Kappe
Re: Carlsen withdrawal after loss to Niemann
Fat Titz by Stockfish, the engine with the bodaciously big net. Remember: size matters. If you want to learn more about this engine just google for "Fat Titz".
-
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2010 5:31 pm
- Location: 223
Re: Carlsen withdrawal after loss to Niemann
Analyzed the Mishra game with CB Centipawn Analysis
http://help.chessbase.com/CBase/16/Eng/ ... alysis.htm
Used lc0 with a search time of 0...
[pgn][Event "CCCSA Fall GM 2020"]
[Site "Charlotte USA"]
[Date "2020.10.04"]
[Round "8"]
[White "Mishra, Abhimanyu"]
[Black "Niemann, Hans Moke"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C55"]
[WhiteElo "2342"]
[BlackElo "2465"]
[Annotator "GLENN"]
[PlyCount "112"]
[EventDate "2020.??.??"]
{[%evp 7,112,5,9,6,16,12,16,12,27,19,25,18,35,9,9,5,14,9,20,15,18,-28,0,-3,-2,-4,0,-4,1,-5,-36,-50,-39,-79,-66,-83,-82,-92,-23,-28,-26,-36,-19,-23,-12,-44,-43,-43,-43,-42,-36,-40,-43,-44,-40,-42,-37,-38,-33,-68,-18,-62,-61,-64,-62,-68,-33,-55,-48,-97,-93,-116,-82,-82,-95,-101,-97,-192,-183,-186,-178,-175,-149,-335,-292,-265,-194,-648,-559,-1005,-874,-1453,-1668,-1790,-1562,-1816,-1743,-29877,-3003,-29880,-558,-29882,-27999,-27998,-27998,-27999,-27999]} 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. d3 h6 {Lc0 v0.28.2:} 5. c3 d6 6. O-O g5 7. Nbd2 g4 8. Ne1 h5 {OK} 9. f4 {OK} exf4 10. Rxf4 {Inaccurate} Bh6 {OK} 11. Rf1 {OK} Qe7 {OK} 12. Nb3 Ne5 13. Bxh6 {OK} Rxh6 14. Nd2 {Inaccurate} Bd7 15. Bb3 {OK} g3 {OK} 16. h3 {OK} Nfg4 {OK} 17. Qe2 {OK} Nh2 {OK} 18. Qe3 $1 {Strong} Rh7 19. Rf4 h4 {OK} 20. d4 {Inaccurate} Ng6 {Best (Easy)} 21. Nd3 O-O-O {OK} 22. Re1 Re8 {Inaccurate} 23. e5 {Best} Nxf4 {OK} 24. Nxf4 c6 25. Nc4 {OK} d5 26. Nd6+ {Inaccurate} Qxd6 $1 {Strong} 27. exd6 Rxe3 {OK} 28. Rxe3 Rh6 {Best (Easy)} 29. Ne2 $1 {Strong} Re6 $1 {Strong} 30. Rxe6 {OK} Bxe6 31. Bc2 Kd7 {OK} 32. Nf4 {OK} Kxd6 {OK} 33. b4 {Inaccurate} b5 {Inaccurate} 34. a4 {Inaccurate} bxa4 {Best} 35. Bxa4 Bf5 {OK} 36. Bb3 Be6 {Inaccurate} 37. Ba4 Bc8 {OK} 38. Bd1 {Inaccurate} Ba6 {Best} 39. Be2 {OK} Bxe2 40. Nxe2 Ke6 41. Nc1 {OK} Kf5 {OK} 42. Nb3 {Mistake (1.0)} (42. Nd3 $17) 42... Ke4 $1 $19 {Strong} 43. Na5 {[#] OK} f5 $1 {Strong} 44. Nxc6 {[#] Best} f4 $1 {Strong} 45. b5 $2 {Loses game (1.9)} (45. Nxa7 $17) 45... f3 $19 {Best (Easy)} 46. gxf3+ {OK} Nxf3+ 47. Kf1 $2 (47. Kg2) 47... Ng5 $19 48. Ne5 Nxh3 49. Ng6 g2+ 50. Kxg2 Nf4+ 51. Nxf4 Kxf4 52. Kh3 Ke4 53. Kxh4 Kd3 54. Kg4 Kxc3 55. Kf5 Kxd4 56. Ke6 Kc5 {Strong: White=2, Black=5 Best: White=2, Black=5 OK: White=13, Black=15 Inaccurate: White=7, Black=3 Mistake: White=1 Loses game: White=1. Weighted Error Value: White=0.77/Black=0.06 Centipawn loss: w=51/b=6} 0-1
[/pgn]
http://help.chessbase.com/CBase/16/Eng/ ... alysis.htm
Used lc0 with a search time of 0...
[pgn][Event "CCCSA Fall GM 2020"]
[Site "Charlotte USA"]
[Date "2020.10.04"]
[Round "8"]
[White "Mishra, Abhimanyu"]
[Black "Niemann, Hans Moke"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C55"]
[WhiteElo "2342"]
[BlackElo "2465"]
[Annotator "GLENN"]
[PlyCount "112"]
[EventDate "2020.??.??"]
{[%evp 7,112,5,9,6,16,12,16,12,27,19,25,18,35,9,9,5,14,9,20,15,18,-28,0,-3,-2,-4,0,-4,1,-5,-36,-50,-39,-79,-66,-83,-82,-92,-23,-28,-26,-36,-19,-23,-12,-44,-43,-43,-43,-42,-36,-40,-43,-44,-40,-42,-37,-38,-33,-68,-18,-62,-61,-64,-62,-68,-33,-55,-48,-97,-93,-116,-82,-82,-95,-101,-97,-192,-183,-186,-178,-175,-149,-335,-292,-265,-194,-648,-559,-1005,-874,-1453,-1668,-1790,-1562,-1816,-1743,-29877,-3003,-29880,-558,-29882,-27999,-27998,-27998,-27999,-27999]} 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. d3 h6 {Lc0 v0.28.2:} 5. c3 d6 6. O-O g5 7. Nbd2 g4 8. Ne1 h5 {OK} 9. f4 {OK} exf4 10. Rxf4 {Inaccurate} Bh6 {OK} 11. Rf1 {OK} Qe7 {OK} 12. Nb3 Ne5 13. Bxh6 {OK} Rxh6 14. Nd2 {Inaccurate} Bd7 15. Bb3 {OK} g3 {OK} 16. h3 {OK} Nfg4 {OK} 17. Qe2 {OK} Nh2 {OK} 18. Qe3 $1 {Strong} Rh7 19. Rf4 h4 {OK} 20. d4 {Inaccurate} Ng6 {Best (Easy)} 21. Nd3 O-O-O {OK} 22. Re1 Re8 {Inaccurate} 23. e5 {Best} Nxf4 {OK} 24. Nxf4 c6 25. Nc4 {OK} d5 26. Nd6+ {Inaccurate} Qxd6 $1 {Strong} 27. exd6 Rxe3 {OK} 28. Rxe3 Rh6 {Best (Easy)} 29. Ne2 $1 {Strong} Re6 $1 {Strong} 30. Rxe6 {OK} Bxe6 31. Bc2 Kd7 {OK} 32. Nf4 {OK} Kxd6 {OK} 33. b4 {Inaccurate} b5 {Inaccurate} 34. a4 {Inaccurate} bxa4 {Best} 35. Bxa4 Bf5 {OK} 36. Bb3 Be6 {Inaccurate} 37. Ba4 Bc8 {OK} 38. Bd1 {Inaccurate} Ba6 {Best} 39. Be2 {OK} Bxe2 40. Nxe2 Ke6 41. Nc1 {OK} Kf5 {OK} 42. Nb3 {Mistake (1.0)} (42. Nd3 $17) 42... Ke4 $1 $19 {Strong} 43. Na5 {[#] OK} f5 $1 {Strong} 44. Nxc6 {[#] Best} f4 $1 {Strong} 45. b5 $2 {Loses game (1.9)} (45. Nxa7 $17) 45... f3 $19 {Best (Easy)} 46. gxf3+ {OK} Nxf3+ 47. Kf1 $2 (47. Kg2) 47... Ng5 $19 48. Ne5 Nxh3 49. Ng6 g2+ 50. Kxg2 Nf4+ 51. Nxf4 Kxf4 52. Kh3 Ke4 53. Kxh4 Kd3 54. Kg4 Kxc3 55. Kf5 Kxd4 56. Ke6 Kc5 {Strong: White=2, Black=5 Best: White=2, Black=5 OK: White=13, Black=15 Inaccurate: White=7, Black=3 Mistake: White=1 Loses game: White=1. Weighted Error Value: White=0.77/Black=0.06 Centipawn loss: w=51/b=6} 0-1
[/pgn]
Judge without bias, or don't judge at all...
-
- Posts: 5685
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:16 am
- Location: Moving
- Full name: Jorge Picado
Re: Carlsen withdrawal after loss to Niemann
His BIO is interesting, but they forgot to tell us in parenthesis, that he is suspected of cheating, therefore, he should be playing with only his Swimsuit onIanKennedy wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 3:35 pm He is playing in the US champs next week against Aronian, Caruana, So and Dominguez.
https://www.uschesschamps.com/2022-us-c ... /the-field

-
- Posts: 5667
- Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:56 pm
Re: Carlsen withdrawal after loss to Niemann
It is simply totally irrelevant to this thread.CornfedForever wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 4:05 pmUri - Of course it’s ‘worse’ in that one is premeditated and the other is incidental…but with Magnus CHOSING to cheat when offered the opportunity. Think of it as Murder vs Manslaughter – either way you killed someone.
I think people (like me anyway) bring up Carlsen’s cheating because:
1. It is the pot calling the kettle black; and
2. Some who are willing to extrapolate and lynch Hans in all forms of chess are often want to bring out their ‘broad brushes’ and will say things like “Once a cheater, always a cheater”…but when confronted with the Magnus video are just as eager to rationalize that one away.
You simply can’t have it both ways.
To some ‘war is war’, to others it’s a ‘special military action’. May they sleep better at night.
Maybe Carlsen likes to torture kittens. Complain all you want, but do it in another thread.
-
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 7:52 pm
- Full name: Dietrich Kappe
Re: Carlsen withdrawal after loss to Niemann
Have you read this thread?

Fat Titz by Stockfish, the engine with the bodaciously big net. Remember: size matters. If you want to learn more about this engine just google for "Fat Titz".
-
- Posts: 5667
- Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:56 pm
Re: Carlsen withdrawal after loss to Niemann
Magnus and Hans made the Dutch "Jeugdjournaal" (news for kids):
Nothing new, obviously, but the ending was funny:
Nothing new, obviously, but the ending was funny:
Er is in ieder geval weer één verliezer. Carlsen, als blijkt dat hij ernaast zit. Of Niemann, als hij inderdaad een chip in zijn sok had. Of misschien... ergens anders... in?
In any case, there is one loser. Carlsen, if it turns out he was wrong. Or Niemann, if indeed he had a chip in his sock. Or maybe... in... something else?
-
- Posts: 5667
- Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:56 pm
Re: Carlsen withdrawal after loss to Niemann
Yes, and please stick to the topic.
-
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 7:52 pm
- Full name: Dietrich Kappe
Re: Carlsen withdrawal after loss to Niemann
Well, part of this thread has been about who we should believe. In particular, if someone who has cheated in the past should be believed. Is that now all out of bounds? Or is this just about Magnus’ withdrawal from the tournament, and any discussion of cheating by Magnus, Niemann or anyone else is off topic?
Do you have a clear idea of what is on-topic that isn’t just arbitrary censoring of arguments that you don’t like?
Fat Titz by Stockfish, the engine with the bodaciously big net. Remember: size matters. If you want to learn more about this engine just google for "Fat Titz".
-
- Posts: 1235
- Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 2:49 pm
Re: Carlsen withdrawal after loss to Niemann
I think you mix up something. It is not Carlsen vs. Niemann, Carlsen is not the only one who speaks out suspicions, also other GM's and different AI cheat detection systems are on the trigger. The question whether Hans is cheating or not has nothing to do with Carlsens credibility. so it is completely useless to question his credibility because he said "how" at the wrong time.
-
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 7:52 pm
- Full name: Dietrich Kappe
Re: Carlsen withdrawal after loss to Niemann
Ah, at the time this thread was started, Carlsen said nothing about cheating. People started speculating about both Niemann’s and Carlsen’s cheating.Alexander Schmidt wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 11:29 pmI think you mix up something. It is not Carlsen vs. Niemann, Carlsen is not the only one who speaks out suspicions, also other GM's and different AI cheat detection systems are on the trigger. The question whether Hans is cheating or not has nothing to do with Carlsens credibility. so it is completely useless to question his credibility because he said "how" at the wrong time.
Fat Titz by Stockfish, the engine with the bodaciously big net. Remember: size matters. If you want to learn more about this engine just google for "Fat Titz".