Rybka 2.3.2a v Naum 3- At The Halfway Mark!

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderator: Ras

User avatar
geots
Posts: 4790
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:42 am

Rybka 2.3.2a v Naum 3- At The Halfway Mark!

Post by geots »

Rybka 2.3.2a 32-bit v Naum 3 32-bit


Intel Pentium 4
Single Processor- 2.8ghz
128mb hash
3 & 4 man tablebases
Perfect 12.32.ctg book (with 12 move CCRL limit)
40 moves in 66 minutes repeating (adapted to CCRL 40/40)
Both = Single CPU
30 Game Match- For the Title


This one's for the 1CPU Title. Winner take all- no excuses!


Daily updates!

PGNs available for download at match conclusion


Rybka Started With White Pieces via Coin Flip:


After Game 15:

Rybka 2.3.2 a---- 1dd1d11ddddd111 = 11
Naum 3----------- 0dd0d00ddddd000 = 4


Two Comments only:

1. Naum 3 seems to be playing extremely solid chess.
2. Rybka is on another panet.
User avatar
geots
Posts: 4790
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:42 am

Re: Rybka 2.3.2a v Naum 3- At The Halfway Mark!

Post by geots »

Anyone care to venture if Naum can right the ship and turn this thing around in the second half!?? There have to be a few interesting theories and/or predictions lurking around out there.
Tony Thomas

Re: Rybka 2.3.2a v Naum 3- At The Halfway Mark!

Post by Tony Thomas »

I doubt it George. Naum seems to be a lot better under my conditions though.
bigo

Re: Rybka 2.3.2a v Naum 3- At The Halfway Mark!

Post by bigo »

THANKS GEORGE DUE TO YOUR POSTING I AM NOT GOING TO BUY NAUM , ALMOST LOST 60 BUCKS!
Tony Thomas

Re: Rybka 2.3.2a v Naum 3- At The Halfway Mark!

Post by Tony Thomas »

bigo wrote:THANKS GEORGE DUE TO YOUR POSTING I AM NOT GOING TO BUY NAUM , ALMOST LOST 60 BUCKS!
George, I think you might want to turn off your spontaneous character switch, if there is one. People reading your post might think that you are telling them to note buy Naum if they havent read any of your previous posts.
User avatar
George Tsavdaris
Posts: 1627
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:35 pm

Re: Rybka 2.3.2a v Naum 3- At The Halfway Mark!

Post by George Tsavdaris »

bigo wrote:THANKS GEORGE DUE TO YOUR POSTING I AM NOT GOING TO BUY NAUM , ALMOST LOST 60 BUCKS!
So the only reason you have in buying Naum or maybe any other Chess engine, is to be able to have a score of more than 11-4 in the first 15 games against Rybka 2.3.2a, on the hardware and time controls George uses?

How do you know Naum is not better with some other hardware or with some other time control?
After his son's birth they've asked him:
"Is it a boy or girl?"
YES! He replied.....
Tony Thomas

Re: Rybka 2.3.2a v Naum 3- At The Halfway Mark!

Post by Tony Thomas »

George Tsavdaris wrote:
bigo wrote:THANKS GEORGE DUE TO YOUR POSTING I AM NOT GOING TO BUY NAUM , ALMOST LOST 60 BUCKS!
So the only reason you have in buying Naum or maybe any other Chess engine, is to be able to have a score of more than 11-4 in the first 15 games against Rybka 2.3.2a, on the hardware and time controls George uses?

How do you know Naum is not better with some other hardware or with some other time control?
Naum is better than the free Rybka under my conditions by about 110 points.
Tony Thomas

Re: Rybka 2.3.2a v Naum 3- At The Halfway Mark!

Post by Tony Thomas »

Code: Select all

Rank Name                           Elo    +    - games score oppo. draws 
   1 Naum 3                        2937   62   57   127   81%  2699   24% 
   2 Hiarcs11.2SPUCI               2913   58   54   147   75%  2706   16% 
   3 Shredder11UCI                 2850   49   47   171   69%  2706   22% 
   4 Fruit 2.3                     2834   46   44   187   68%  2702   25% 
   5 Rybka v1.0 Beta.w32           2832   39   38   243   68%  2701   25% 
   6 TogaII 1.4 beta 5c            2831   59   57   110   66%  2708   24% 
   7 Glaurung 2.0.1 JA             2825   50   49   151   65%  2708   25% 
   8 Ktulu 8.0                     2781   40   40   237   60%  2702   19% 
   9 ChessTiger2007UCI             2774   40   37   390   87%  2456   19% 
  10 Bright-0.2c                   2748   51   50   143   56%  2707   22% 
  11 Zappa Mexico II               2741   52   51   135   56%  2707   24% 
  12 Spike 1.2 Turin               2733   39   39   238   54%  2701   25% 
  13 AlaricWB707                   2727   47   47   159   53%  2708   25% 
  14 Smarthink 1.00                2708   39   39   236   51%  2703   25% 
  15 Gandalf 6.01                  2689   40   40   228   48%  2702   23% 
  16 Scorpio 2.0                   2689   49   49   159   47%  2709   14% 
  17 Delfi 5.1                     2681   48   48   153   49%  2689   25% 
  18 List 5.12                     2681   53   53   118   49%  2686   29% 
  19 DeepSjeng27                   2671   44   44   183   45%  2705   25% 
  20 Pharaon 3.5.1                 2657   39   39   236   43%  2704   25% 
User avatar
geots
Posts: 4790
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:42 am

Re: Rybka 2.3.2a v Naum 3- At The Halfway Mark!

Post by geots »

bigo wrote:THANKS GEORGE DUE TO YOUR POSTING I AM NOT GOING TO BUY NAUM , ALMOST LOST 60 BUCKS!

I am a bit over 99% sure that you are just taking some kind of shot here at me for God only knows why. But just on the ever, ever, ever so slight off chance that you are not- i will repeat this once again- slowly for you.
Naum 3.0_is_IMO_a_great_buy. Can it beat Rybka on most probably any hardware- very doubful. Would i buy it knowing what i know now? MOST DEFINITELY I WOULD. Limit your purchases to the programs that can give Rybka a run for her money- your_shelf_will_be_empty. (Im getting too old for this shit.)

PS: Buy it- don't buy it. I have bigger fish to fry.
User avatar
Ovyron
Posts: 4562
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 4:30 am

Re: Rybka 2.3.2a v Naum 3- At The Halfway Mark!

Post by Ovyron »

George Tsavdaris wrote: How do you know Naum is not better with some other hardware or with some other time control?
Does 'Preserve Hash' mean that Naum keeps the hash from all its games? If so, I predict that after enough games, Naum can learn to beat Rybka 8-)