THINKER 5.3B - A VERY STRONG ENGINE !

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderator: Ras

User avatar
Sylwy
Posts: 4869
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: IAȘI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
Full name: Silvian Rucsandescu

THINKER 5.3B - A VERY STRONG ENGINE !

Post by Sylwy »

swami
Posts: 6662
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:21 am

Re: THINKER 5.3B - A VERY STRONG ENGINE !

Post by swami »

Good to know that there is a new version of Thinker, any idea about its improvement, I assume you've tested it already? Ps; I'm right now not at home, so the site to download it from gets blocked.

Regards.
User avatar
Sylwy
Posts: 4869
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: IAȘI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
Full name: Silvian Rucsandescu

Re: THINKER 5.3B - A VERY STRONG ENGINE !

Post by Sylwy »

swami wrote:
Good to know that there is a new version of Thinker, any idea about its improvement, I assume you've tested it already? Ps; I'm right now not at home, so the site to download it from gets blocked.

Regards.
Hi !

On a quick test (on single core ) Thinker 5.3B is over Fruit 05/11/03 and Loop 13.6 ( Passive version X32 )-in 10'+5" time control.
Nothing about Active and Inert ( yes-a new version ) !

Regards,
Silvian
:lol:
swami
Posts: 6662
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:21 am

Re: THINKER 5.3B - A VERY STRONG ENGINE !

Post by swami »

Sylwy wrote:
swami wrote:
Good to know that there is a new version of Thinker, any idea about its improvement, I assume you've tested it already? Ps; I'm right now not at home, so the site to download it from gets blocked.

Regards.
Hi !

On a quick test (on single core ) Thinker 5.3B is over Fruit 05/11/03 and Loop 13.6 ( Passive version X32 )-in 10'+5" time control.
Nothing about Active and Inert ( yes-a new version ) !

Regards,
Silvian
:lol:
That's good indeed, Thanks for sharing the results.

We have Cyclone, Stockfish and now Thinker, we have got a lot to test! :wink:
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 44645
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: THINKER 5.3B - A VERY STRONG ENGINE !

Post by Graham Banks »

swami wrote:
Good to know that there is a new version of Thinker, any idea about its improvement, I assume you've tested it already? Ps; I'm right now not at home, so the site to download it from gets blocked.

Regards.
Thinker 5.3b Inert is supposed to be the strongest for engine v engine testing.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
swami
Posts: 6662
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:21 am

Re: THINKER 5.3B - A VERY STRONG ENGINE !

Post by swami »

Graham Banks wrote:
swami wrote:
Good to know that there is a new version of Thinker, any idea about its improvement, I assume you've tested it already? Ps; I'm right now not at home, so the site to download it from gets blocked.

Regards.
Thinker 5.3b Inert is supposed to be the strongest for engine v engine testing.
Thanks, Last time I tested it, It was "Passive", now It's been changed to "Inert". I assume both are the same settings with the name changed.

Anyway, It's going to be 3rd strongest engine next to Rybka and Naum in ACCA. With hardware disadvantage it has, I think it will contend for the 4th placings.
tmokonen
Posts: 1362
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 6:46 pm
Location: Kelowna
Full name: Tony Mokonen

Re: THINKER 5.3B - A VERY STRONG ENGINE !

Post by tmokonen »

swami wrote: Thanks, Last time I tested it, It was "Passive", now It's been changed to "Inert". I assume both are the same settings with the name changed.

Anyway, It's going to be 3rd strongest engine next to Rybka and Naum in ACCA. With hardware disadvantage it has, I think it will contend for the 4th placings.
Actually, there are three different versions of Thinker now, Passive, Active and Inert. I guess, going by the name, Inert's playing style is supposed to be somewhere in between Passive and Active...? Also, Lance Perkins is now working on Thinker with another person, Kerwin Medina, as announced in the Winboard Forum.

Tony
swami
Posts: 6662
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:21 am

Re: THINKER 5.3B - A VERY STRONG ENGINE !

Post by swami »

tmokonen wrote:
swami wrote: Thanks, Last time I tested it, It was "Passive", now It's been changed to "Inert". I assume both are the same settings with the name changed.

Anyway, It's going to be 3rd strongest engine next to Rybka and Naum in ACCA. With hardware disadvantage it has, I think it will contend for the 4th placings.
Actually, there are three different versions of Thinker now, Passive, Active and Inert. I guess, going by the name, Inert's playing style is supposed to be somewhere in between Passive and Active...? Also, Lance Perkins is now working on Thinker with another person, Kerwin Medina, as announced in the Winboard Forum.

Tony
Thanks for the info, Tony. I wasn't aware of it.
User avatar
Ovyron
Posts: 4562
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 4:30 am

Re: THINKER 5.3B - A VERY STRONG ENGINE !

Post by Ovyron »

I never liked Active's playing style, it was prone to play moves that gave away draws into lost positions (moves that would have worked against humans.)

If Inert is the new Passive, I wonder what's Passive good for now? Unless Inert sacrifices playing style for strength ala Fritz/Shredder11/Hiarcs12, in such case I'd keep on using Passive.

I still hope these versions get thoroughly tested, unless 5.3C is released too soon...
Tony Thomas

Re: THINKER 5.3B - A VERY STRONG ENGINE !

Post by Tony Thomas »

tmokonen wrote:
swami wrote: Thanks, Last time I tested it, It was "Passive", now It's been changed to "Inert". I assume both are the same settings with the name changed.

Anyway, It's going to be 3rd strongest engine next to Rybka and Naum in ACCA. With hardware disadvantage it has, I think it will contend for the 4th placings.
Actually, there are three different versions of Thinker now, Passive, Active and Inert. I guess, going by the name, Inert's playing style is supposed to be somewhere in between Passive and Active...? Also, Lance Perkins is now working on Thinker with another person, Kerwin Medina, as announced in the Winboard Forum.

Tony
From the name I thought that Inert would be something that plays a boring game, yet manages to win sort of like Rybka 2.3.2.