How long takes your engine to find the best move?
[d]rnb1k1nr/p2p1ppp/3B4/1p1N1N1P/4P1P1/3P1Q2/PqP5/R4Kb1 w kq -
kind regards
Bernhard
			
			
									
						
										
						historic testposition
Moderator: Ras
- 
				rightrook
- Posts: 1452
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:45 pm
Re: historic testposition
Hi..This is alot like  many of Paul Morphy's great moves....they are an enigma for the chess programs today...they just do not find them....I tested this one before....even on the old dedicated machines years ago!
For example.....Hiarcs 11.2 only plays e5....etc
Ruffian 105 plays the same thing...... 
 
regards
Robert
			
			
									
						
										
						For example.....Hiarcs 11.2 only plays e5....etc
Ruffian 105 plays the same thing......
 
 regards
Robert
- 
				AdminX  
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 2:34 pm
- Location: Acworth, GA
Re: historic testposition
Hey Robert,BBauer wrote:How long takes your engine to find the best move?
[d]rnb1k1nr/p2p1ppp/3B4/1p1N1N1P/4P1P1/3P1Q2/PqP5/R4Kb1 w kq -
kind regards
Bernhard
You are close, It is from Anderssen vs. Kieseritzky 1851. Anyway here are two very different opinions.
Analysis by Rybka 3:
1.e5 Qxa1+ 2.Ke2[] Ba6[] 3.Nc7+[] Kd8 4.Nxa6[] Qc3 5.Bc7+[] Qxc7[] 6.Nxc7[] Nc6[] 7.Nxa8[] g6 8.Qg2 gxf5 9.gxf5[] Nh6 10.Qg7 Re8 11.Qf6+ Re7 12.Qxh6[] Rxe5+ 13.Kf1 Bd4 14.Qf8+ Re8 15.Qxf7 Re7 16.Qg8+
+- (1.58) Depth: 14 00:00:00 4kN
+- (2.07) Depth: 20 00:15:30 189mN
Analysis by Deep Fritz 11
1.Re1 Bb7 2.Qf4 Bxd5 3.exd5+ Kd8 4.Bc7+ Kc8 5.Kxg1 Kb7 6.Nd6+ Kxc7 7.Nc4+ Kb7 8.Nxb2 Na6 9.Nc4 bxc4 10.Rb1+ Kc8 11.Qxf7 Nh6 12.Qxg7 Rg8 13.Qxh6
-/+ (-0.78) Depth: 10/30 00:00:00 2113kN
+- (5.32) Depth: 23/53 00:15:45 7126mN
I kind of like the Deep Fritz 11 line.

"Good decisions come from experience, and experience comes from bad decisions."
__________________________________________________________________
Ted Summers
			
						__________________________________________________________________
Ted Summers
- 
				rightrook
- Posts: 1452
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:45 pm
Re: historic testposition
Yes, I know.....I was just comparing it to one of the moves made by Morphy (that computers do not find)....  
 
regards
Robert
			
			
									
						
										
						 
 regards
Robert
- 
				BBauer
- Posts: 658
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:58 pm
Re: historic testposition
I like the output of Fritz too.   
 
However I do not like your 15 min.
You should give a try to Glaurung or Stockfish.
Rybka looks very poor.
kind regards
Bernhard
			
			
									
						
										
						 
 However I do not like your 15 min.
You should give a try to Glaurung or Stockfish.
Rybka looks very poor.
kind regards
Bernhard
- 
				rightrook
- Posts: 1452
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:45 pm
Re: historic testposition
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1018910
Move 18.....Bd6 is also a great test move...that no engine can find....
At least the ones that I tested... 
 
regards
Robert
			
			
									
						
										
						Move 18.....Bd6 is also a great test move...that no engine can find....

At least the ones that I tested...
 
 regards
Robert
- 
				BBauer
- Posts: 658
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:58 pm
Re: historic testposition
Move 18.....Bd6 is also a great blunder, so *no* engine should find it.
Kind regards
Bernhard
			
			
									
						
										
						Kind regards
Bernhard
- 
				CThinker
- Posts: 388
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:08 pm
Re: historic testposition
Thinker 5.4A finds e5 with a positive score. But 5.4B finds e5 with a mate score, very early (like, depth 12) and sticks with it. I have not looked at the source code, so, I can't validate what it is doing.