Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.
Moderator: Ras
beram
Posts: 1187Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 3:11 pm
Post by beram Wed Dec 05, 2012 7:59 pm
Houdini wrote: beram wrote: Wow 0,51 after 9 moves for Houdini
Where did you see that?
80% is for a +1.0 advantage against an equal opponent at blitz TC.
Robert
Sorry en excuus, bad memory of mine
Lavir
Posts: 263Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 11:45 am
Post by Lavir Wed Dec 05, 2012 8:04 pm
Well, anyway now it is at +0.70 so something maybe is indeed there.
Jouni
Posts: 3688Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:15 pmFull name: Jouni Uski
Post by Jouni Wed Dec 05, 2012 8:21 pm
Yes 1 - 0 for sure. I have feeling, that H3 1CPU will be enough for this Cluster
Somebody has really paid for use Rybka Cluster!?
Jouni
Houdini
Posts: 1471Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2010 12:00 am
Post by Houdini Wed Dec 05, 2012 8:23 pm
16.Qc3! appeared to be a very good unexpected move.
The Rybka eval dropped by 0.3.
When Houdini starts sacking pawns, all is well
.
Lavir
Posts: 263Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 11:45 am
Post by Lavir Wed Dec 05, 2012 8:26 pm
LOL.
That's so true
Houdini
Posts: 1471Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2010 12:00 am
Post by Houdini Wed Dec 05, 2012 8:46 pm
26.Qd5+ is another unexpected move (instead of Bd3), Houdini gives +1.46.
Lavir
Posts: 263Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 11:45 am
Post by Lavir Wed Dec 05, 2012 8:47 pm
Houdini +1.70, Rybka Clu +0.80 (for the cluster Qd5 was a worse move than Bd3).
Lavir
Posts: 263Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 11:45 am
Post by Lavir Wed Dec 05, 2012 8:56 pm
Or there will be a miracle or this will be another loss for the Cluster (RIP).
Houdini
Posts: 1471Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2010 12:00 am
Post by Houdini Wed Dec 05, 2012 9:03 pm
The current position after 31.h5 g5.
Lavir
Posts: 263Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 11:45 am
Post by Lavir Wed Dec 05, 2012 9:12 pm
Yet another time, this game has shown that the Rybka Cluster evaluation is always one step back from the one of Houdini.
Somebody has really paid for use Rybka Cluster!?
.