Alexander Schmidt wrote:Here you say that it is a silly thought that customers understand it in a wrong way
hgm wrote:defending that silly thought by claiming most people would misunderstand that in the same way.
Well, if you don't understand plain English, this will be tedious...
It says of course no such thing. What it does say is that:
1) It is a silly thought that putting knowledge from person X in the evaluation of a Chess engine would make the engine play like X.
2) It is nonsense that you should be excused for thinking a silly thing just because others do. Wrong is wrong, no matter how many people make the same mistake.
Alexander Schmidt wrote:Diskussions with you lead always to the same point. Do you never get tired to evidence that you know more respectless and abusive phrases in english? I am out of here. Once more...
Respect has to be earned. And so far you have been wrong about everything you wrote, in ways that do make you look pretty foolish by objective standards. "Having egg on your face" is just a normal English expression for that.
If you don't like someone pointing it out, the best remedy is not to do it...