Stockfish get too deep and see nothing

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderator: Ras

Spliffjiffer
Posts: 436
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2012 7:48 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Stockfish get too deep and see nothing

Post by Spliffjiffer »

your interest...dream...and dream on...
Wahrheiten sind Illusionen von denen wir aber vergessen haben dass sie welche sind.
Milos
Posts: 4190
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:47 am

Re: Stockfish get too deep and see nothing

Post by Milos »

peter wrote: Tue Jan 25, 2022 10:33 pm Wouldn't it be somewhat easier to install a Crystal 4.0 of your own? I can really recommend it :)

https://github.com/jhellis3/Stockfish/releases/tag/v4.0


[fen]q7/1kp5/3p4/pPpPp1p1/P1P1PpPp/3N1PbP/2Q5/5K2 w - - 0 1[/fen]


Analysis by Crystal 251221:

65.Qc3 Bh2 66.Nxc5+ dxc5 67.Qxe5 Qg8 68.Qf6 Kb8 69.Qh6 Qd8 70.e5 Qe7 71.e6 Kc8 72.Kg2 Bg3 73.Qh8+ Kb7 74.Kf1 Bh2 75.Kf2 Ka7 76.Kg2 Bg3 77.Qe5 Kb7 78.d6 cxd6 79.Qf5 Kb6 80.Qe4 d5 81.cxd5 c4 82.Qd4+ Kc7 83.Qe5+ Kb7 84.d6 Qh7 85.Qd5+ Kb8 86.Qd2 c3 87.Qe2 c2 88.d7 Kb7 89.d8Q
+- (151.24) Depth: 39/134 00:03:04 14697MN

Yet after the position of your premoves, SF with classical eval (faster mate search) would serve as well, here I took SF11 for a quick Backward of the line above:

q7/1kp5/3p4/pPpPp1p1/P1P1PpPp/3N1PbP/2Q5/5K2 w - - 0 1

Analysis by Stockfish 11 64 POPCNT:

65.Qc3 Qc8 66.Nxc5+ dxc5 67.Qxe5 Qg8 68.Qf6 Ka7 69.Qa6+ Kb8 70.Qh6 Qd8 71.e5 Qe7 72.e6 Ka7 73.Qh8 Kb7 74.Qe5 Ka7 75.d6 cxd6 76.Qf5 Kb6 77.Qe4 d5 78.Qe5 Kb7 79.Qxd5+ Kc7 80.Qc6+ Kb8 81.Qb6+ Kc8 82.Qa6+ Kd8 83.Qxa5+ Kc8 84.Qa8+ Kc7 85.Qa7+ Kd6 86.Qxe7+ Kxe7 87.b6 Kxe6 88.b7 Ke5 89.b8Q+ Kd4 90.a5 Kxc4 91.a6 Be1 92.Kxe1 Kc3 93.a7 c4 94.Qb5 Kd4 95.a8Q Kc3 96.Qa3+ Kc2 97.Qbb2#
+- (#33) Depth: 84/66 00:01:56 8751MN

So, as for my premoves, please take the ones of the SF- line, even if there could be still a few moves spared as for shortest DTM maybe, I'd say, there can't be much to much of them now that way till we're ready regards
:)
Here is the probably the fastest mate and also the final game:
[pgn]
[White "Peter"]
[Black "Milos"]
[FEN "2k5/2p5/1q1p4/pPpPp1pp/N1P1Pp2/P4PbP/KQ4P1/8 w - - 0 46"]
[Termination "1-0"]
[PlyCount "93"]
[WhiteType "human"]
[BlackType "human"]

46. Qb1 h4 47. Qb2 Kd8 48. Kb1 Kd7 49. Kc2 Kc8 50. Kd2 Kd7 51. Ke2 Kc8 52.
Qb3 Kb7 53. Qc2 Bh2 54. Qd2 Bg3 55. Kf1 Kc8 56. Qc2 Kb7 57. Nb2 Qa7 58. Qb3
Bh2 59. Na4 Qb6 60. g4 Bg3 61. Qc2 Kc8 62. Nb2 Qa7 63. a4 Qa8 64. Nd3 Kb7 65. Qc3 Bh2 66. Nxc5+ dxc5 67.
Qxe5 Qg8 68. Qf6 Kb8 69. Qh6 Qd8 70. Qg7 c6 71. Qe5+ Ka8 72. d6 cxb5 73. axb5 Bg1 74. Kxg1 a4 75. Qd5+ Kb8 76. d7 a3 77. e5 a2 78. Qd6+ Kb7 79.
Qa6+ Kb8 80. e6 Kc7 81. Qxa2 Kd6 82. Qa6+ Ke5 83. Qc8 Qa5 84. Qh8+ Kxe6 85.
Qe8+ Kf6 86. d8=B+ Qxd8 87. Qxd8+ Kf7 88. Qd7+ Kf6 89. b6 Ke5 90. b7 Kf6
91. b8=Q Kg6 92. Qbd6# *[/pgn]
peter
Posts: 3410
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 7:38 am
Full name: Peter Martan

Re: Stockfish get too deep and see nothing

Post by peter »

Milos wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 10:32 pm Here is the probably the fastest mate and also the final game:
[pgn]
[White "Peter"]
[Black "Milos"]
[FEN "2k5/2p5/1q1p4/pPpPp1pp/N1P1Pp2/P4PbP/KQ4P1/8 w - - 0 46"]
[Termination "1-0"]
[PlyCount "93"]
[WhiteType "human"]
[BlackType "human"]

46. Qb1 h4 47. Qb2 Kd8 48. Kb1 Kd7 49. Kc2 Kc8 50. Kd2 Kd7 51. Ke2 Kc8 52.
Qb3 Kb7 53. Qc2 Bh2 54. Qd2 Bg3 55. Kf1 Kc8 56. Qc2 Kb7 57. Nb2 Qa7 58. Qb3
Bh2 59. Na4 Qb6 60. g4 Bg3 61. Qc2 Kc8 62. Nb2 Qa7 63. a4 Qa8 64. Nd3 Kb7 65. Qc3 Bh2 66. Nxc5+ dxc5 67.
Qxe5 Qg8 68. Qf6 Kb8 69. Qh6 Qd8 70. Qg7 c6 71. Qe5+ Ka8 72. d6 cxb5 73. axb5 Bg1 74. Kxg1 a4 75. Qd5+ Kb8 76. d7 a3 77. e5 a2 78. Qd6+ Kb7 79.
Qa6+ Kb8 80. e6 Kc7 81. Qxa2 Kd6 82. Qa6+ Ke5 83. Qc8 Qa5 84. Qh8+ Kxe6 85.
Qe8+ Kf6 86. d8=B+ Qxd8 87. Qxd8+ Kf7 88. Qd7+ Kf6 89. b6 Ke5 90. b7 Kf6
91. b8=Q Kg6 92. Qbd6# *[/pgn]
The mate might be the fastest one after your 65...Bh2, after the ...Qc8 of my output- line from yesterday (with anyhow as presumed too long DTM) it might be yet one move longer.

Afer 65...Bh2:

q7/1kp5/3p4/pPpPp1p1/P1P1PpPp/2QN1P1P/7b/5K2 w - - 0 1

Analysis by Stockfish 11 64 POPCNT30:

66.Nxc5+ dxc5 67.Qxe5 Qg8 68.Qf6 Kb8 69.Qh6 Qd8 70.Qg7 c6 71.Qe5+ Ka8 72.d6 cxb5 73.axb5 a4 74.Qd5+ Ka7 75.d7 Bg1 76.Kxg1 a3 77.e5 a2 78.Qxc5+ Kb7 79.Qc6+ Kb8 80.Qd6+ Kb7 81.Qa6+ Kb8 82.e6 Qc7 83.Kg2 a1Q 84.Qxa1 Kb7 85.Qa6+ Kb8 86.c5 Qd8 87.Kh1 Qc7 88.c6 Qxd7 89.cxd7 Kc7 90.Qc6+ Kd8 91.Qb6+ Ke7 92.d8Q#
+- (#27) Tiefe: 80/54 00:00:15 904MN

And after 65...Qc8:

2q5/1kp5/3p4/pPpPp1p1/P1P1PpPp/2QN1PbP/8/5K2 w - - 0 1

Analysis by Stockfish 11 64 POPCNT30:

66.Nxc5+ dxc5 67.Qxe5 Qg8 68.Qf6 Ka8 69.Qa6+ Kb8 70.Qh6 Qd8 71.Qg7 c6 72.Qe5+ Ka8 73.d6 cxb5 74.axb5 a4 75.Qd5+ Kb8 76.d7 a3 77.Qd6+ Kb7 78.e5 a2 79.Qa6+ Kb8 80.e6 Kc7 81.Qxa2 Kd6 82.Qa6+ Ke5 83.Qc8 Qa5 84.Qh8+ Kxe6 85.Qe8+ Kf6 86.d8Q+ Qxd8 87.Qxd8+ Kg6 88.b6 Be1 89.Qg8+ Kf6 90.b7 Ba5 91.b8Q Ke7 92.Qge8+ Kf6 93.Qbe5#
+- (#28) Depth: 90/56 00:02:44 11898MN

Anyhow it's the result that counts only regards
Peter.
Paloma
Posts: 1207
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 9:07 pm
Full name: Herbert L

Re: Stockfish get too deep and see nothing

Post by Paloma »

Hi Peter,

first, thanks for your competition! 8-)

I found out (SF11ofc) after 65...Qc8:

66.Qxa5 is one move better than 66.Nxc5+

e.g. 66..Kb8 67.Nc1 Qb7 68.Nb3 Kc8 69.Qd2 Qa7 70.a5 22#
peter
Posts: 3410
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 7:38 am
Full name: Peter Martan

Re: Stockfish get too deep and see nothing

Post by peter »

Paloma wrote: Thu Jan 27, 2022 12:13 am I found out (SF11ofc) after 65...Qc8:

66.Qxa5 is one move better than 66.Nxc5+

e.g. 66..Kb8 67.Nc1 Qb7 68.Nb3 Kc8 69.Qd2 Qa7 70.a5 22#
Or even two moves better :)
After 65...Qc8 again:

2q5/1kp5/3p4/pPpPp1p1/P1P1PpPp/2QN1PbP/8/5K2 w - - 0 1

Analysis by Stockfish 11 64 POPCNT30:

66.Qxa5 Kb8 67.Nc1 Qb7 68.Qd2 Qb6 69.Nb3 Kc8 70.a5 Qb7 71.a6 Qb6 72.Na5 Kb8 73.Nc6+ Ka8 74.Qa5 Qxa5 75.Nxa5 Ka7 76.Nc6+ Kb6 77.Nd8 Bh2 78.Ne6 Bg3 79.Nxg5 Ka7 80.Ne6 Kb6 81.g5 c6 82.dxc6 Bf2 83.Kxf2 d5 84.c7 Ka5 85.a7 dxe4 86.c8Q Kb4 87.Qxc5+ Kb3 88.a8Q e3+ 89.Ke2 Kc2 90.Qa2+ Kc1 91.Qca3#
+- (#26) Depth: 89/52 00:01:23 5720MN

So Milos was right about 65...Bh2 yet maybe, as long as you don't find a detour in this one line also.
:)
Peter.
Uri Blass
Posts: 10884
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:37 am
Location: Tel-Aviv Israel

Re: Stockfish get too deep and see nothing

Post by Uri Blass »

Milos wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 10:32 pm
peter wrote: Tue Jan 25, 2022 10:33 pm Wouldn't it be somewhat easier to install a Crystal 4.0 of your own? I can really recommend it :)

https://github.com/jhellis3/Stockfish/releases/tag/v4.0


[fen]q7/1kp5/3p4/pPpPp1p1/P1P1PpPp/3N1PbP/2Q5/5K2 w - - 0 1[/fen]


Analysis by Crystal 251221:

65.Qc3 Bh2 66.Nxc5+ dxc5 67.Qxe5 Qg8 68.Qf6 Kb8 69.Qh6 Qd8 70.e5 Qe7 71.e6 Kc8 72.Kg2 Bg3 73.Qh8+ Kb7 74.Kf1 Bh2 75.Kf2 Ka7 76.Kg2 Bg3 77.Qe5 Kb7 78.d6 cxd6 79.Qf5 Kb6 80.Qe4 d5 81.cxd5 c4 82.Qd4+ Kc7 83.Qe5+ Kb7 84.d6 Qh7 85.Qd5+ Kb8 86.Qd2 c3 87.Qe2 c2 88.d7 Kb7 89.d8Q
+- (151.24) Depth: 39/134 00:03:04 14697MN

Yet after the position of your premoves, SF with classical eval (faster mate search) would serve as well, here I took SF11 for a quick Backward of the line above:

q7/1kp5/3p4/pPpPp1p1/P1P1PpPp/3N1PbP/2Q5/5K2 w - - 0 1

Analysis by Stockfish 11 64 POPCNT:

65.Qc3 Qc8 66.Nxc5+ dxc5 67.Qxe5 Qg8 68.Qf6 Ka7 69.Qa6+ Kb8 70.Qh6 Qd8 71.e5 Qe7 72.e6 Ka7 73.Qh8 Kb7 74.Qe5 Ka7 75.d6 cxd6 76.Qf5 Kb6 77.Qe4 d5 78.Qe5 Kb7 79.Qxd5+ Kc7 80.Qc6+ Kb8 81.Qb6+ Kc8 82.Qa6+ Kd8 83.Qxa5+ Kc8 84.Qa8+ Kc7 85.Qa7+ Kd6 86.Qxe7+ Kxe7 87.b6 Kxe6 88.b7 Ke5 89.b8Q+ Kd4 90.a5 Kxc4 91.a6 Be1 92.Kxe1 Kc3 93.a7 c4 94.Qb5 Kd4 95.a8Q Kc3 96.Qa3+ Kc2 97.Qbb2#
+- (#33) Depth: 84/66 00:01:56 8751MN

So, as for my premoves, please take the ones of the SF- line, even if there could be still a few moves spared as for shortest DTM maybe, I'd say, there can't be much to much of them now that way till we're ready regards
:)
Here is the probably the fastest mate and also the final game:
[pgn]
[White "Peter"]
[Black "Milos"]
[FEN "2k5/2p5/1q1p4/pPpPp1pp/N1P1Pp2/P4PbP/KQ4P1/8 w - - 0 46"]
[Termination "1-0"]
[PlyCount "93"]
[WhiteType "human"]
[BlackType "human"]

46. Qb1 h4 47. Qb2 Kd8 48. Kb1 Kd7 49. Kc2 Kc8 50. Kd2 Kd7 51. Ke2 Kc8 52.
Qb3 Kb7 53. Qc2 Bh2 54. Qd2 Bg3 55. Kf1 Kc8 56. Qc2 Kb7 57. Nb2 Qa7 58. Qb3
Bh2 59. Na4 Qb6 60. g4 Bg3 61. Qc2 Kc8 62. Nb2 Qa7 63. a4 Qa8 64. Nd3 Kb7 65. Qc3 Bh2 66. Nxc5+ dxc5 67.
Qxe5 Qg8 68. Qf6 Kb8 69. Qh6 Qd8 70. Qg7 c6 71. Qe5+ Ka8 72. d6 cxb5 73. axb5 Bg1 74. Kxg1 a4 75. Qd5+ Kb8 76. d7 a3 77. e5 a2 78. Qd6+ Kb7 79.
Qa6+ Kb8 80. e6 Kc7 81. Qxa2 Kd6 82. Qa6+ Ke5 83. Qc8 Qa5 84. Qh8+ Kxe6 85.
Qe8+ Kf6 86. d8=B+ Qxd8 87. Qxd8+ Kf7 88. Qd7+ Kf6 89. b6 Ke5 90. b7 Kf6
91. b8=Q Kg6 92. Qbd6# *[/pgn]
83.Qc8 is not the fastest mate based on chest.

better is 83. Kf1 Qf8 84. Qa5 Qg8 85. d8=Q Qxd8 86. Qxd8 Kxe6 87. b6 Ke5 88. b7 Ke6 89. b8=Q Kf7 90. Qb7+ Ke6 91. Qbd5#
peter
Posts: 3410
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 7:38 am
Full name: Peter Martan

Re: Stockfish get too deep and see nothing

Post by peter »

Uri Blass wrote: Thu Jan 27, 2022 12:59 am
Milos wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 10:32 pm Here is the probably the fastest mate and also the final game:
[pgn]
[White "Peter"]
[Black "Milos"]
[FEN "2k5/2p5/1q1p4/pPpPp1pp/N1P1Pp2/P4PbP/KQ4P1/8 w - - 0 46"]
[Termination "1-0"]
[PlyCount "93"]
[WhiteType "human"]
[BlackType "human"]

46. Qb1 h4 47. Qb2 Kd8 48. Kb1 Kd7 49. Kc2 Kc8 50. Kd2 Kd7 51. Ke2 Kc8 52.
Qb3 Kb7 53. Qc2 Bh2 54. Qd2 Bg3 55. Kf1 Kc8 56. Qc2 Kb7 57. Nb2 Qa7 58. Qb3
Bh2 59. Na4 Qb6 60. g4 Bg3 61. Qc2 Kc8 62. Nb2 Qa7 63. a4 Qa8 64. Nd3 Kb7 65. Qc3 Bh2 66. Nxc5+ dxc5 67.
Qxe5 Qg8 68. Qf6 Kb8 69. Qh6 Qd8 70. Qg7 c6 71. Qe5+ Ka8 72. d6 cxb5 73. axb5 Bg1 74. Kxg1 a4 75. Qd5+ Kb8 76. d7 a3 77. e5 a2 78. Qd6+ Kb7 79.
Qa6+ Kb8 80. e6 Kc7 81. Qxa2 Kd6 82. Qa6+ Ke5 83. Qc8 Qa5 84. Qh8+ Kxe6 85.
Qe8+ Kf6 86. d8=B+ Qxd8 87. Qxd8+ Kf7 88. Qd7+ Kf6 89. b6 Ke5 90. b7 Kf6
91. b8=Q Kg6 92. Qbd6# *[/pgn]
83.Qc8 is not the fastest mate based on chest.

better is 83. Kf1 Qf8 84. Qa5 Qg8 85. d8=Q Qxd8 86. Qxd8 Kxe6 87. b6 Ke5 88. b7 Ke6 89. b8=Q Kf7 90. Qb7+ Ke6 91. Qbd5#
Saw that, but thought a shortcut from Black's side at 75 to compensate the detour from White at 83.
Yet that was wrong too, alternative 75...Ka7 instead of ...Kb8 turned out 91 all in all again.

Now I'm stuck at (instead of ...Bg1) 73 ...a4:

k2q4/8/3P4/1Pp1Q1p1/p1P1PpPp/5P1P/7b/5K2 w - - 0 1

Analysis by Stockfish 11 64 POPCNT30:

74.Qd5+ Ka7 75.d7 Bg1 76.Kxg1 a3 77.Qxc5+ Kb7 78.Qc6+ Kb8 79.e5 a2 80.Qd6+ Kb7 81.Qa6+ Kb8 82.e6 Qc7 83.Kg2 a1Q 84.Qxa1 Kb7 85.Qd1 Kb6 86.d8Q Qxd8 87.Qxd8+ Kc5 88.e7 Kxc4 89.e8Q Kc3 90.Qe2 Kb3 91.Qd4 Ka3 92.Qeb2#
+- (#19) Depth: 96/38 00:01:22 9536MN

Old 73...Bg1:

k2q4/8/3P4/pPp1Q1p1/2P1PpPp/5P1P/8/5Kb1 w - - 0 1

Analysis by Stockfish 11 64 POPCNT30:

74.Kxg1 a4 75.Qd5+ Ka7 76.Qd2 a3 77.e5 Kb7 78.Kg2 Qb6 79.d7 a2 80.Qd5+ Ka7 81.d8Q Qxd8 82.Qxd8 a1Q 83.b6+ Ka6 84.Qa8+ Kxb6 85.Qxa1 Kc7 86.Qa7+ Kc6 87.e6 Kd6 88.Qd7+ Ke5 89.e7 Kf6 90.e8N+ Kg6 91.Qg7#
+- (#18) Depth: 97/36 00:00:35 2822MN

65...Bh2:

q7/1kp5/3p4/pPpPp1p1/P1P1PpPp/2QN1P1P/7b/5K2 w - - 0 1

Analysis by Stockfish 11 64 POPCNT30:

66.Nxc5+ dxc5 67.Qxe5 Qg8 68.Qf6 Kb8 69.Qh6 Qd8 70.Qg7 c6 71.Qe5+ Ka8 72.d6 cxb5 73.axb5 a4 74.Qd5+ Ka7 75.Qc6 a3 76.Qa6+ Kb8 77.b6 Qxd6 78.Qa7+ Kc8 79.b7+ Kd8 80.b8Q+ Qxb8 81.Qxb8+ Ke7 82.Qa7+ Kf6 83.Qxa3 Ke6 84.Qd3 Bg1 85.Kxg1 Kf7 86.e5 Ke6 87.Qd6+ Kf7 88.Qf6+ Kg8 89.e6 Kh7 90.e7 Kg8 91.Qg6+ Kh8 92.e8Q#
+- (#27) Depth: 82/54 00:00:17 1204MN

65.Qc3 MultiPV=2;

q7/1kp5/3p4/pPpPp1p1/P1P1PpPp/2QN1PbP/8/5K2 b - - 0 1

Analysis by Stockfish 11 64 POPCNT30:

1. +- (#27): 65...Bh2 66.Nxc5+ dxc5 67.Qxe5 Qg8 68.Qf6 Kb8 69.Qh6 Qd8 70.Qg7 c6 71.Qe5+ Ka8 72.d6 cxb5 73.axb5 a4 74.Qd5+ Ka7 75.Qc6 Bg1 76.Qa6+ Kb8 77.b6 Qxd6 78.Qa7+ Kc8 79.b7+ Kd8 80.b8R+ Qxb8 81.Qxb8+ Kd7 82.Qa7+ Ke6 83.Kxg1 a3 84.Qxa3 Ke7 85.Qxc5+ Ke6 86.Qd5+ Kf6 87.Qf5+ Kg7 88.c5 Kg8 89.c6 Kg7 90.c7 Kh6 91.c8Q Kg7 92.Qcf8#

2. +- (#26): 65...Qc8 66.Qxa5 Kb8 67.Nc1 Qb7 68.Nb3 Bh2 69.Qd2 Qa7 70.a5 Bg3 71.a6 Ka8 72.Na5 Qb6 73.Qa2 Ka7 74.Nc6+ Ka8 75.Qa4 Bh2 76.Ne7 Qb8 77.Qa5 Bg3 78.Nc6 Be1 79.Kxe1 Qc8 80.b6 cxb6 81.Qxb6 Qc7 82.Qb2 Qb6 83.Qb5 Qc7 84.Nxe5 Qg7 85.Qe8+ Ka7 86.Nc6+ Kxa6 87.Qa8+ Kb6 88.Qa5+ Kb7 89.Qa7+ Kc8 90.Qb8+ Kd7 91.Qd8#

Depth 91.

I'm outa here (unless I yet find something else :)).
Peter.
Paloma
Posts: 1207
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 9:07 pm
Full name: Herbert L

Re: Stockfish get too deep and see nothing

Post by Paloma »

Yes, is good enough.

Your computer with SF11 is a BEAST for mat search. :D
Spliffjiffer
Posts: 436
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2012 7:48 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Stockfish get too deep and see nothing

Post by Spliffjiffer »

Milos wrote: Tue Jan 25, 2022 2:59 pm For A/B engines I'm certain there is none that can win even with 1h per move. Lc0 maybe, but again I'm really skeptical.
For humans if they can do a quick check with a helper engine on the side it's rather easy. Without engine, probably not so easy.
I feel not good how i argumented, i wanna say thx for the game that u played here and i was able to follow !
thank you for the comment above, u made,...i want to agree with you by 100%...
a really hard task for current (A/B)- engines of our days to win this pos !

plz appologize my inappropriate speaking, all the best
Peer
Wahrheiten sind Illusionen von denen wir aber vergessen haben dass sie welche sind.
Paloma
Posts: 1207
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 9:07 pm
Full name: Herbert L

Re: Stockfish get too deep and see nothing

Post by Paloma »

Hi Peer,
after 63. a4 is ...Qa8 not good, because 64. Nd3 is mat in 29

63...Qc6 or ...Kb7 lengthen the mat to 41! 64. Nd3 41#