Hiarcs will never win against Naum. Naum is to strong for Hiarcs.
Thomas
Looks like another win for Hiarcs??
Moderator: Ras
-
Daniel Charles
Re: Looks like another win for Hiarcs??
Hello Thomas
I think you talk only about this game
Looks like Naum will Win
Daniel
I think you talk only about this game
Looks like Naum will Win
Daniel
-
Enrico
Re: Looks like another win for Hiarcs??
I'm glad you are a HIARCS fan, Thomas. You speak of some serious "absolutes" from a single game.
Congratulations, however, to Alex on his fine work with Naum as well as to Rybka -- Co-Winners of the event.
-elc.
Congratulations, however, to Alex on his fine work with Naum as well as to Rybka -- Co-Winners of the event.
-elc.
Thomas Gaksch wrote:Hiarcs will never win against Naum. Naum is to strong for Hiarcs.
Thomas
-
Ryan Benitez
- Posts: 719
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 1:21 am
- Location: Portland Oregon
Re: Looks like another win for Hiarcs??
Naum is a very strong engine, maybe the best engine with big hardware, but hiarcs is also very good. What happened to the luck factor you talked about the other day? I can not think of a stronger 32bit engine than Hiarcs, it seems like a better idea to be a fan of such a great engine than be bitter and/or jealous of it.Thomas Gaksch wrote:Hiarcs will never win against Naum. Naum is to strong for Hiarcs.
Thomas
-
Graham Banks
- Posts: 44908
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: Looks like another win for Hiarcs??
I suspect that Thomas might have been talking about the game in question, which was indeed won eventually by Naum.Ryan Benitez wrote:Naum is a very strong engine, maybe the best engine with big hardware, but hiarcs is also very good. What happened to the luck factor you talked about the other day? I can not think of a stronger 32bit engine than Hiarcs, it seems like a better idea to be a fan of such a great engine than be bitter and/or jealous of it.Thomas Gaksch wrote:Hiarcs will never win against Naum. Naum is to strong for Hiarcs.
Thomas
This seems to be confirmed by the timing of his post and then Daniel's post three minutes later.
I doubt that his comment was malicious in that context.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
George Tsavdaris
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:35 pm
Re: Looks like another win for Hiarcs??
When you see CCRL 40/40 list you can see that for example:Ryan Benitez wrote: Naum is a very strong engine, maybe the best engine with big hardware, but hiarcs is also very good. What happened to the luck factor you talked about the other day? I can not think of a stronger 32bit engine than Hiarcs, it seems like a better idea to be a fan of such a great engine than be bitter and/or jealous of it.
Rybka 2.1 32bit 4CPU seems to be stronger than any version of latest Hiarcs on 4 CPU's.
Also you can see that Toga II 1.3.1 seems a bit stronger than the single CPU version of Hiarcs 11.1.
Looking at CEGT you can also find many examples of 32-bit engines stronger than Hiarcs.
After his son's birth they've asked him:
"Is it a boy or girl?"
YES! He replied.....
"Is it a boy or girl?"
YES! He replied.....
-
Enrico
Re: Looks like another win for Hiarcs??
Explain the use of "never"?
-elc.
-elc.
Graham Banks wrote:I suspect that Thomas might have been talking about the game in question, which was indeed won eventually by Naum.Ryan Benitez wrote:Naum is a very strong engine, maybe the best engine with big hardware, but hiarcs is also very good. What happened to the luck factor you talked about the other day? I can not think of a stronger 32bit engine than Hiarcs, it seems like a better idea to be a fan of such a great engine than be bitter and/or jealous of it.Thomas Gaksch wrote:Hiarcs will never win against Naum. Naum is to strong for Hiarcs.
Thomas
This seems to be confirmed by the timing of his post and then Daniel's post three minutes later.
I doubt that his comment was malicious in that context.
-
Graham Banks
- Posts: 44908
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: Looks like another win for Hiarcs??
Enrico wrote:Explain the use of "never"?
-elc.
Is English Thomas's first language?
I took it it to mean that Hiarcs would never win that game. This seems to be confirmed by the timing of his post, which was when Hiarcs was struggling.
I guess only Thomas can confirm one way or the other for sure.
In the meantime, surely it's sensible to give him the benefit of the doubt.
Regards, Graham.
Graham Banks wrote:I suspect that Thomas might have been talking about the game in question, which was indeed won eventually by Naum.Ryan Benitez wrote:Naum is a very strong engine, maybe the best engine with big hardware, but hiarcs is also very good. What happened to the luck factor you talked about the other day? I can not think of a stronger 32bit engine than Hiarcs, it seems like a better idea to be a fan of such a great engine than be bitter and/or jealous of it.Thomas Gaksch wrote:Hiarcs will never win against Naum. Naum is to strong for Hiarcs.
Thomas
This seems to be confirmed by the timing of his post and then Daniel's post three minutes later.
I doubt that his comment was malicious in that context.
Last edited by Graham Banks on Sun Jan 27, 2008 9:50 pm, edited 2 times in total.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
George Tsavdaris
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:35 pm
Re: Looks like another win for Hiarcs??
Bad English?Enrico wrote:Explain the use of "never"?
After his son's birth they've asked him:
"Is it a boy or girl?"
YES! He replied.....
"Is it a boy or girl?"
YES! He replied.....
-
Ryan Benitez
- Posts: 719
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 1:21 am
- Location: Portland Oregon
Re: Looks like another win for Hiarcs??
I highly doubt Toga can beat Hiarcs on 8x hardware.George Tsavdaris wrote:When you see CCRL 40/40 list you can see that for example:Ryan Benitez wrote: Naum is a very strong engine, maybe the best engine with big hardware, but hiarcs is also very good. What happened to the luck factor you talked about the other day? I can not think of a stronger 32bit engine than Hiarcs, it seems like a better idea to be a fan of such a great engine than be bitter and/or jealous of it.
Rybka 2.1 32bit 4CPU seems to be stronger than any version of latest Hiarcs on 4 CPU's.
Also you can see that Toga II 1.3.1 seems a bit stronger than the single CPU version of Hiarcs 11.1.
Looking at CEGT you can also find many examples of 32-bit engines stronger than Hiarcs.