Testing LazySMP

[LazySMP]

Not an excuse at all. If you can eventually reach 2400, I'll be happy to include it in my Amateur Series.

I've released LazySMP version 5.0, which has a rating of about 2400, if you are honest, please test it now.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13bIEMF ... j-g-l/view

[Graham Banks]

Not an excuse at all. If you can eventually reach 2400, I'll be happy to include it in my Amateur Series.

I've released LazySMP version 5.0, which has a rating of about 2400, if you are honest, please test it now.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13bIEMF ... j-g-l/view

Please configure it to use 256mb hash first, then I'll put it in Division 11.

[Brunetti]

I've released LazySMP version 5.0, which has a rating of about 2400

Out of curiosity, how did you manage to gain 400 points in just 4 hours after saying you couldn’t do it?

Alex

[LazySMP]

How did you manage to gain 400 points in just 4 hours after saying you couldn’t do it?

According to Einstein's Special theory of relativity, time is relative. Time depends on the reference frame of the observer. If one observer moves with a speed of light then the time will slower down for him. On the other hand if the other observer moves slower than the speed of light then the time will pass faster.

[Modern Times]

Not an excuse at all. If you can eventually reach 2400, I'll be happy to include it in my Amateur Series.

I've released LazySMP version 5.0, which has a rating of about 2400, if you are honest, please test it now.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13bIEMF ... j-g-l/view

Please configure it to use 256mb hash first, then I'll put it in Division 11.

Why ? He has already explained why it uses only a small amount of memory, and it is not a CCRL requirement that an engine must use the "maximum" amount:

2) Smaller hash size can be used if an engine has problems with particular hash size, or if it does not allow to configure hash size.

[Graham Banks]

Not an excuse at all. If you can eventually reach 2400, I'll be happy to include it in my Amateur Series.

I've released LazySMP version 5.0, which has a rating of about 2400, if you are honest, please test it now.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13bIEMF ... j-g-l/view

Please configure it to use 256mb hash first, then I'll put it in Division 11.

Why ? He has already explained why it uses only a small amount of memory, and it is not a CCRL requirement that an engine must use the "maximum" amount:

2) Smaller hash size can be used if an engine has problems with particular hash size, or if it does not allow to configure hash size.

Quite simple - because I won't test it otherwise. My choice and not a CCRL expectation.

[Sylwy]

Not an excuse at all. If you can eventually reach 2400, I'll be happy to include it in my Amateur Series.

I've released LazySMP version 5.0, which has a rating of about 2400, if you are honest, please test it now.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13bIEMF ... j-g-l/view

THANK YOU !
Added in my tournament !

[Modern Times]

Not an excuse at all. If you can eventually reach 2400, I'll be happy to include it in my Amateur Series.

I've released LazySMP version 5.0, which has a rating of about 2400, if you are honest, please test it now.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13bIEMF ... j-g-l/view

Please configure it to use 256mb hash first, then I'll put it in Division 11.

Why ? He has already explained why it uses only a small amount of memory, and it is not a CCRL requirement that an engine must use the "maximum" amount:

2) Smaller hash size can be used if an engine has problems with particular hash size, or if it does not allow to configure hash size.

Quite simple - because I won't test it otherwise. My choice and not a CCRL expectation.

Fair enough. I'm sure he can put some lines of code in there that makes the engine take up 256MB and do absolutely nothing with it, to keep you happy.

[LazySMP]

Actually, I'm not looking at ones that are weaker than 2400 for now. However, it would be ideal if your engine was also able to use 256mb hash.

Isn't this your quote?

[Graham Banks]

Actually, I'm not looking at ones that are weaker than 2400 for now. However, it would be ideal if your engine was also able to use 256mb hash.

Isn't this your quote?

Yes, and here was yours:

I've released LazySMP version 5.0, which has a rating of about 2400