Testing LazySMP

[Tibono]

An effort deserves an effort... just sharing a logo.

http://tibono.free.fr/temp/LazySMP.bmp

[ImNotStockfish]

An effort deserves an effort... just sharing a logo.

http://tibono.free.fr/temp/LazySMP.bmp

Downloading a picture from the internet, not giving it the required attribution, and slapping some text over it... how is that effort?

[supernova]

I've released LazySMP version 5.0, which has a rating of about 2400, if you are honest, please test it now.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13bIEMF ... j-g-l/view

Could you please summarize your fixes from versions 3 and 4, as well as confirm whether the engine is SMP or the UCI Thread Option is useless?

[LazySMP]

I don't understand you. Was appearing on the CCRL list the only motivation for you to develop your engine?

From the beginning, (Stockfish) members tried to spoil/ruin my discussion so that my engine wouldn't be tested.
Some comments were deleted and transferred to kindergarten. Graham says he won't test my engine because it doesn't support TT.

However, it would be ideal if your engine was also able to use 256mb hash.

Please configure it to use 256mb hash first, then I'll put it in Division 11.

If you want me to test it, I'd like the option of using 256mb hash.

It is clear that he is looking for an excuse not to test my engine.

[LazySMP]

Graham is under no obligation whatsoever to test your engine, and if there is any 'delay', you caused it yourself by wasting your time on arguing with Graham rather than further developing your engine to make sure it would meet Graham's demands for running engines in his tournaments.

Whether I try or not; I've lost all game. Whether I stay or not; I made a memory of myself. I said what I had to say. Whether my engine is tested or not...
Goodbye

[Jjaw]

Lololol

[supernova]

I've released LazySMP version 5.0, which has a rating of about 2400, if you are honest, please test it now.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13bIEMF ... j-g-l/view

Could you please summarize your fixes from versions 3 and 4, as well as confirm whether the engine is SMP or the UCI Thread Option is useless?

For the second time, you did not even mention and reply to my message. This is the short test with the last version. Results are similar to previous versions. Engine is around 2000-2100 CCRL. Games and epd logs are below.

Code: Select all

LazySMP 5.0 : 

Fruit 2.2                            :   30  :   1+  :   0=  :  29-  :    3.33%

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iVpqJ5 ... drive_link

[LazySMP]

For the second time, you did not even mention and reply to my message. This is the short test with the last version. Results are similar to previous versions. Engine is around 2000-2100 CCRL.

Sorry, I decided to leave chess programming forever. The behavior of CCRL members was so disappointing that I see no point to continue. They did not test my engine for no reason and it's not their fault, it's the Stockfish community members who made them pessimistic and destroyed my discussion:

[Uri Blass]

For the second time, you did not even mention and reply to my message. This is the short test with the last version. Results are similar to previous versions. Engine is around 2000-2100 CCRL.

Sorry, I decided to leave chess programming forever. The behavior of CCRL members was so disappointing that I see no point to continue. They did not test my engine for no reason and it's not their fault, it's the Stockfish community members who made them pessimistic and destroyed my discussion:

I do not understand you.
1)There are many testers and not all of them from CCRL(I read that part of them tested your engine).
2)The CCRL did not forbid testers to test your engine.
3)One tester did not want to test your engine.
It is his right and I do not see why do you consider it to be a good reason to leave chess programming forever.
4)I do not see how the stockfish community members relevant and I do not see how the rating of the engine is relevant because
there are people who test engines with no hash tables and below 2500(of course not everybody has to agree to test engines that are weaker than 2500).

[Uri Blass]

I see that carlos test all the weak engines not for CCRL and publish the results.

viewtopic.php?t=84433

I guess you can wait for his next tournament when LazySMP can start from the lowest league and promote(because the lowest league has players that are clearly below rating 1800).